![]() ![]() On May 6, 1983, Tracey filed for and was granted a restraining order against Buck. The police gave Tracey various excuses for their inaction including "the officer who has your case is on vacation." On five separate occasions in May 1983, Tracey appeared at the Torrington Police Station to request the arrest of her husband because of his repeated threats of violence. She reported these threats to police, but no action was taken. īetween January and May 1983, Buck made numerous threats to Tracey, violating the court order. Tracey reported the behavior to police, but no effort was made to arrest Buck. He was ordered to stay away from Tracey, but within weeks, Buck resumed threatening Tracey. Buck was convicted of breach of the peace and received a six-month suspended sentence with a two-year conditional discharge. Although there was a police officer nearby, he did not intervene until Buck broke the windshield of Tracey's car with his fist. įour days later, Buck stood in front of Tracey's car on a public street and verbally threatened her. ![]() was returned to his mother, but the police refused to accept a complaint of criminal trespass from the homeowner. In November 1982, Buck forcibly entered the home Tracey was staying at and removed Charles Jr. ![]() For eight months, the couple lived apart while Buck harassed Tracy and verbally threatened to kill her. She took with her their only child, Charles Jr. In 1982, Tracey Thurman left her husband, Charles "Buck" Thurman, after a brief but violent marriage. 1521 (1985) was a court decision concerning Tracey Thurman, a Connecticut homemaker who sued the city police department in Torrington, Connecticut, and claimed a failure of equal protection under the law against her abusive husband Charles "Buck" Thurman, Sr. The court further finds that the City of Torrington did not maintain a standard policy of legal discrimination against all women.Ĭonnecticut Family Violence Prevention and Response Act of 1986 Local police of the City of Torrington ignored domestic violence reports pertaining to the husband of Tracey Thurman and further failed to enforce a court ordered restraining order. I look forward to receiving your response to this request within 4 business days, as the statute requires.United States District Court for the District of Connecticut Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. I would prefer the request filled electronically, by e-mail attachment if available or CD-ROM if not. In the event that there are fees, I would be grateful if you would inform me of the total charges in advance of fulfilling my request. The requested documents will be processed by a representative of the news media/press and made available to the public at. § 1-212(d), fees be waived as I believe this request is in the public interest and not made for commercial gain. I also request that, if possible and pursuant to Conn. If I can be of any assistance in interpreting or narrowing this request, please don't hesitate to contact me. If your database does not allow searches that far back, please let me know how far back you can search. This request is limited to reports generated on or after October 1, 2000, through the present date. Please provide a copy of any crime/incident report (or similar police reports) in which a person was investigated, stopped, cited, arrested, or charged with violating Connecticut General Statutes § 53-37 (or "ridicule"). If so, this request seeks records over a longer period of time. ![]() You may have received an earlier version of this survey. This is a public records survey of law enforcement agencies throughout Connecticut. Pursuant to the Connecticut Freedom of Information Act, I hereby request the following records: Subject: Connecticut Freedom of Information Act Request: Connecticut § 53-37 Arrests Since 2000 (Torrington Police Department) ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |